Response quality
Correctness, completeness, factuality, relevance, instruction following, style and domain-specific quality.
Evaluate models
Build evaluation datasets, rubrics and human review workflows for model quality, safety, reasoning, retrieval, tool use and full agent trajectories.
Built around the real work
Choose the parts of the data and quality workflow that match the behavior, market or modality you are building for.
Every capability is shaped around downstream use: what the model needs to learn, what reviewers need to judge and what your team needs to ship with confidence.
Talk through your workflowCorrectness, completeness, factuality, relevance, instruction following, style and domain-specific quality.
Expert-created tasks, detailed rubrics and reference solutions for technical and analytical work.
Refusal quality, harmful-content handling, jailbreak resilience, policy adherence and adversarial behavior.
Document relevance, groundedness, citation support, context use and retrieval failure cases.
Whether the agent selected the right tool, supplied valid arguments and stayed within permitted scope.
Evaluate tool paths, unnecessary steps, recovery, loops, policy gates and final task completion.
Don’t grade an agent like a chatbot
For simple tasks, the final answer may be enough. For agents, evaluation must also test tool selection, arguments, retrieval, trajectory and recovery behavior.
The operating model
Keep the benchmark connected to the product behavior it is meant to protect.
Translate product requirements into measurable dimensions and failure taxonomies.
Curate real, synthetic and adversarial cases with references or expected trajectories.
Align humans and automated evaluators on rubrics, examples and edge cases.
Compare models, prompts, retrieval strategies or agent versions on the same set.
Promote important production failures into the benchmark and targeted training data.
Quality that holds up in production
No single evaluator works for every task. Combine deterministic checks, model-based graders and calibrated human experts based on ambiguity and risk.
What arrives at the end
Clear outputs, stable structure and the context needed to move the work into training, evaluation or production.
Where it fits
Compare versions against the same representative test set.
Separate retrieval relevance, groundedness and answer faithfulness.
Score tool decisions, trajectories, recovery and final outcomes.
Create policy edge cases and review behavior under adversarial pressure.
Start with the outcome
Start with the behaviors that matter most in production. We’ll help define the benchmark, rubric, expert profile and evaluation workflow around it.